To rid the world of him would be doing a favor to all little old ladies walking around with things in their pockets. Eliminate the threat.Who knows what other crimes he fancies, from rape to burglary.It is not the value of the things in the pockets that is the true measure, but the place we hold in this society that we’ve created. Thanks It all comes down to using your judgement in each event as they actually happen to you. Only problem is, I’m not sure if I can put an image from that into a post. The big difference is if you fear for your own or another’s life.

Accidental or intentional killing? If you intended to injure them -and you could have got away or hidden or whatever – and they die, that’s murder anyway. It’s best not to test their resolve. Of course, if you’re really good at one or another martial art, you might be able to talk him down. Very impressive.

I assume you get that. If you do, you’re in the clear. We cannot tell. Originally Posted by sculptor You would kill another human being over the things you carry in your pockets?wowseems a tad rad to me dad I would.

Of course, if you’re really good at one or another martial art, you might be able to talk him down. Related Discussions:Date notation conventions: Ga, BCE, bya, etcAre these the same?Conway chained arrow notationBasic thermodynamics: please helpDerivativeWhat symbol do they use to bracket square brackets? Is there any end it it?Arg Max notation?NotationsAlternative mathematical notationsQuestion about logic notation Not a good assumption.

If I’d known that, I wouldn’t have had the problem. If you do, you’re in the clear. Thanks. I asked this question because I get so scared at times I walk alone knowing that someone might hold me up and take all my belongings.

Hello guysI would just like to ask if it would be considered a crime if you accidentally or intentionally killed a person who tried to rob you? Of course you were defending yourself as he was trying to mug you, but does that give you the license to kill as your life has been threatened by the robber? Just curious. Not justifiable if you could get away from the danger. This is the (E) isomer.On the left side of the double bond, the CH3CH2- has priority over the -CH3.

It REALLY depends on where you live, and most importantly, the exact circumstances of the event. Oh! It seems very clear to me now. Try retyping it as something like:CH3CH2C=CCH2CH3 | | CH3 Clor maybe it is the other isomer.

Might I accidentally kill or seriously injure the robber while defending, then I wouldn’t go to jail for doing it. Beware of the fact that laws (and the way they are enforced) may differ from one country to another. On the right side the Cl has priority over the -CH2CH3 because a chlorine atom has a higher atomic weight than a carbon atom. They just threaten it so people will give it up. I’ll probably end up with more questions as I go through the book, and I’ll be sure to post them on here, as you seem to know what you’re doing.

Hopefully from what I gave you can figure out the structural formula of the molecule. The big difference is if you fear for your own or another’s life. I asked this question because I get so scared at times I walk alone knowing that someone might hold me up and take all my belongings.

Nobody’s getting my money away from me! My money? It was the government’s money, and it was a government official telling you what to do with the government’s money. If you do, you’re in the clear. You have to prove self-defense and judges are generally reluctant to admit it.

Related Discussions:Is the Greece economic crises because of shortage of money?Self defenseArchaic Crust Theory:Self Defense ClassArchbishop Didn’t Know Sex With Children Was a Crimeactive aircraft defense systems.Reg defense application oriented project !!Tesla Coil as a defense???Self Defense for womenUK and execution policy So the top gets high priority and the bottom gets low priority.”*There’s our ethyl group.** And now methyl.Review the Wiki article and I think you’ll catch on quickly to E,Z notation.A* Thank you! On to the top, there’s another carbon*, but on the bottom, a hydrogen**. And I’d think that it is the methyl and chlorine that are considered the substituents because the rest of it is clearly the 3-hexene part of the molecule. We had office training for handling the larger crowds we used to get at certain times of the year and one of the issues was how much cash was around. When he places my life by the worth in my pockets, I place him to the same measure.Inscribe it on his grave marker:”Here lies a fool that did something stupid.

Robbery and theft are bad things, but not so bad that you die for them. Thanks So anyways…CH3CH2…………CH2CH3…………\………./…………..C.=.C…………/……….\……CH3………….Cl If you practice a martial art, make use of it and kill a thief which was not using a weapon, then the self-defense may be denied.Even if the “agressor” is not killed but only wounded you may face a trial and have to prove self-defense the same way.Of course, this is for my country, and it may be very different in your.So, if you intent to shoot at somebody who is stealing your bicycle, have a call to your lawyer first. Talking to a bloke who had a woman in a kind of headlock – and he let her go eventually even though my friend didn’t so much as touch either of them. Oh no, no, no! exclaimed a cashier.

As for little old ladies. As someone who has been mugged 3 times, it’s far better just to give them what they want…and most law enforcement will tell you the same thing. I assume you get that.

Originally Posted by thefreethinker31 Originally Posted by adelady Not justifiable if you could get away from the danger. How do you know that he doesn’t just want the things in your pockets? Most people who commit robbery are not terribly keen on inflicting major violence. Thanks again.

Darwin Points-Plus 1″ It can be either the cis or trans isomer, or represent either one. Got to the point where the trainer advised what to do in the case of a robbery, being stay calm, hand it over, be observant about the people so you can identify them for the police. The crucial phrase is “proportional to the threat” rule of thumb would be that the force used was the least amount necessary to negate the threat to your life.

Even if my pockets were empty.Here is why:A person that thinks so little of my life as to be willing to kill me over that things in my pockets will see others this way as well. A young lad rode up on a bike and stole an old ladies handbag and rode away – fast. There was an incident near my grandparents old house.

There’s actually a nice program that I have called ChemSketch, and it’d be easy to make the structural formula in it. I watched a friend of mine do this in a city street once. If I had to pass through a bad neighborhood on a regular basses I’d order some military grade pepper spray to carry with me and practice being very aware and alert of my surroundings at all times. I didn’t know that…I’m going to have to go through that section now and see if it’s in there, or how I missed it.

The big difference is if you fear for your own or another’s life. I watched a friend of mine do this in a city street once. Absolutely. A*Yep, you got it now.And, as you can see, it’s all quite simple.Good luck with the rest of your course.A* Be as prepared as you can, because anybody looking to rob you education essay writing service
will size you up first, and your confident body language may well forestall any problems for you.Also, be aware that if you use deadly force and kill an attacker, you will most likely be in for some long drawn out legal troubles whether or not you get convicted of anything, and paying for a good lawyer is going to hurt anyway you look at it. Let’s see if this’ll do it… Very impressive. Accidental or intentional killing? If you intended to injure them -and you could have got away or hidden or whatever – and they die, that’s murder anyway.

A*This is from the Wiki article referred to in my previous post. Ok, I’ve got it now, but let me know if this is a good way to look at it…Obviously, the Cl has priority. Originally Posted by adelady Not justifiable if you could get away from the danger. Of course, if you’re really good at one or another martial art, you might be able to talk him down.

Originally Posted by thefreethinker31 Hello guysI would just like to ask if it would be considered a crime if you accidentally or intentionally killed a person who tried to rob you? Of course you were defending yourself as he was trying to mug you, but does that give you the license to kill as your life has been threatened by the robber? Just curious. Life isn’t like the movies. I watched a friend of mine do this in a city street once.

A*There is the problem that the structure you have tried to reproduce is ambiguous. Since the two higher priority groups are on opposite sides (trans) of the double bond, the isomer is (E).See the Wiki discussion of E,Z notation over here:http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Organic…es#EZ_Notation.A* In my country (France), killing a person, even if this person was committing an act of agression, is an homicide (volontary or unvolontary) and you have to face a trial for it. Oh! It seems very clear to me now. In fact, maybe you can identify the above structure as either E or Z, regardless of whether it is the isomer in your question. (Recall that a chlorine atom has higher priority than a carbon atom.)A*A* You would kill another human being over the things you carry in your pockets?wowseems a tad rad to me dad Any help would be appreciated, I really want to understand this.

So in case I still don’t get it from the book, why does the ethyl get priority over the methyl? Accidental or intentional killing? If you intended to injure them -and you could have got away or hidden or whatever – and they die, that’s murder anyway.

The author also gives an example using a methyl and an ethyl group:”The priority is based on the atomic number of the substituents…”On the right side, we have carbon substituents on both the top and bottom, so we go out to the next bond. Might I accidentally kill or seriously injure the robber while defending, then I wouldn’t go to jail for doing it. Originally Posted by SteveF On the left side of the double bond, the CH3CH2- has priority over the -CH3. For instance, you cannot pretend self-defense when using a weapon against somebody who dont carry a weapon, even if that person was trespassing your property.

So from there, we want to examine the substituents on the same and opposite side of the double bond, namely the methyl group and the upper-left ethyl group. it’s far better just to give them what they want That brings back memories. Talking to a bloke who had a woman in a kind of headlock – and he let her go eventually even though my friend didn’t so much as touch either of them. Talking to a bloke who had a woman in a kind of headlock – and he let her go eventually even though my friend didn’t so much as touch either of them. Very impressive. The rule is that the defense act must be *proportional* to the threat.

He behaved as though he was talking about throwing himself on a grenade to protect …. exactly who or what is an interesting question. So, we next look at the next element bonded to those carbons, which in the case of the methyl group is hydrogen, but in the case of the ethyl group, another carbon, so carbon takes priority over hydrogen and the two highest-priority groups are Cl and CH3CH2. A*OK, now we have it. Thank you! OK..nobody said you wouldn’t go to jail.

This bloke was apparently willing to die for the sake of one day’s takings in one of dozens of offices across the country. I simply can’t figure out why it’s E and not Z, considering the methyl and chlorine substituents are on the same side of the double bond. Looking at them, the element bonded directly to the C = C in both cases is carbon, so they’re of equal priority.